On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13 -0700, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for > > this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2 > > might turn out to be useful for this code as well. > > > > > Now I would really like to promote a comprehensive understanding of that policy. > > > > It would be nice to have an example of how do the build for something like this > > in one spec file. > > The documentation there is is at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > but it's not a lot. That is where I would expect sse2 information; either inline or a pointer to something more comprehensive. Not much is using sse2 right now. I would expect that the main ogre package could make use of this, but currently doesn't. I am having trouble finding good documentation on what the runtime linker does. The link below is the best description I have found so far, and answers a question I had about whether stuff needs to be in /usr/lib/sse2/OGRE or /usr/lib/OGRE/sse2 (the former). (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0704.3/0002.html I think I know enough to attempt a -sse2 subpackage for x86 arch. The path to proven packager is paved with much learning. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list