On Tuesday 27 October 2009 03:48:13 pm Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > +%multilib32 sparc sparcv8 sparcv9 sparcv9v ppc s390
> > +%multilib64 x86_64 sparc64 sparc64v ppc64 s390x
> >
> > Remind me what the asymmetry is for here? Why is %{ix86} not in
> > %{multilib32} ?
>
> Hm, maybe a stupid question: in what sense are %{ix86} multilib in the
> first place?
when you install %{ix86} packages on a x86_64 system. same for ppc and
%{sparc32} and s390.
Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
