On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Adam Jackson wrote: > +%multilib32 sparc sparcv8 sparcv9 sparcv9v ppc s390 > +%multilib64 x86_64 sparc64 sparc64v ppc64 s390x > > Remind me what the asymmetry is for here? Why is %{ix86} not in > %{multilib32} ? Hm, maybe a stupid question: in what sense are %{ix86} multilib in the first place? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list