On 09/28/2009 10:27 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Robert Relyea <rrelyea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Currently there are also a half dozen features in mod_nss that aren't in >> mod_ssl. SNI is definately something that would be welcomed in NSS, and >> would probably be implemented by the NSS team itself if it's not >> contributed first;), particularly if it got added to the list of >> impediments. >> > How does one add to this impediments list? I wasn't sure from the wiki page. > Basically it's bug tracking. Which bugs get pushed depends on how many packages are affected and the 'importance' of the package (and the missing feature). bob > It is not just the scorecard that's unclear - it was also confusing to > see Apache marked as "Done (mod_nss ) ".[1] If that's true, what do > all of these open httpd/apr bugs ([2],[3],[4],[5]) mean? No, it means the mod_nss has been ported. These fixes are relatively high on the list, but not yet at the top. bob > On a related > note, Joe didn't seem too enthusiastic about PHP, either [6]. > > - Ken > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347181 > [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347601 > [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346541 > [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346551 > [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347911 > >
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
