Re: crypto consolidation status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Robert Relyea <rrelyea@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently there are also a half dozen features in mod_nss that aren't in
> mod_ssl.  SNI is definately something that would be welcomed in NSS, and
> would probably be implemented by the NSS team itself if it's not
> contributed first;), particularly if it got added to the list of
> impediments.

How does one add to this impediments list? I wasn't sure from the wiki page.

It is not just the scorecard that's unclear - it was also confusing to
see Apache marked as "Done (mod_nss ) ".[1] If that's true, what do
all of these open httpd/apr bugs ([2],[3],[4],[5]) mean? On a related
note, Joe didn't seem too enthusiastic about PHP, either [6].

- Ken

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347181
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347601
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346541
[5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346551
[6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347911

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux