On 09/24/2009 04:22 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > Not really and you're being a little dramatic, I think. If we don't > install it but have its default state be 'on' then they can just do: > > yum install yum-presto > > and then they're done. > > On the other hand someone who has good bandwidth can easily also do: > yum remove yum-presto > > and it is off. > > > As I said when asked the last time - I don't have a preference if it is > installed and on or not installed. I don't consider the single command a > significant barrier, either way. > > > I don't think it is the end of the world, either way. The inconvenience for a high-bandwidth user of having to wait a little longer for the update to complete is minor compared to someone on dialup having to spend hours updating (or days, if they've just installed and are unaware of yum-presto), or someone with bandwidth caps having to pay for the download. Besides, the high-bandwidth users can keep themselves busy using the connection for something else while the update finishes. And even they might want to help reduce the load on the mirrors.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
