On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I've used both. xinetd has lots of useful features (conf.d-style
> Martin Langhoff, Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:29:48 +0200:
>> In other words, xinetd is a saviour when you are running OLPC's School
>> Servers :-)
>
> That's not the point Steve was trying to make (I guess) ... what you need
> could be easily as well accomplished by its predecessory inetd server
config, rate limiting, etc). My understanding was that it aimed at
being a better inetd, and within those goals, it definitily does the
trick. And anyone taking on xinetd maintainership has my respect and a
few beers next time we meet.
Maybe inetd has grown all those same features in the meantime? If it
does, the manpage I have at hand right now doesn't know about it.
Someone have ever looked or considered Apple launchd ?
cheers,
m
> which does bascially the same thing (and is default on Debian for
> example, http://packages.debian.org/sid/inetutils-inetd).
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
--
martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
