Re: Xinetd resurrection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I always thought that one reason for xinetd was the capability of running
>> network servers without actually having any network code in the server.
>
> Its network code, it just doesn't do listen/accept. :) Of course xinetd also
> takes care of restricting access a number of ways like time of day , network,
> tcp_wrappers, and setting up the uid/group...

Yes. I use it to write small network services and not have to worry
about implementing all the rate control and access limiting stuff.

And some of these services are written in python, and seldom used;
xinetd saves a ton of memory.

In other words, xinetd is a saviour when you are running OLPC's School
Servers :-)



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux