On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 12:13 -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 10:32 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > 2009/9/15 Jerry Vonau <jvonau@xxxxxxx>:
> > > However, I see that the older buildinstall(s) are not present any
> > > more(?)! (File a bug I guess) If you were to add the buildinstall from
> > > F9's anaconda in revisor's script directory as F9-buildinstall, then the
> > > buildinstall from F9 should be used instead of the one on the host
> > > system.
> >
Grab the source rpm for revisor, in the /scripts you'll find the
F9-buildinstall, use that one.
>
> > I did that and it now fails at a later point. I first had to modify pungi.py
> > + buildinstall.append('--output')
> > buildinstall.append(self.topdir)
> >
> > and the end result is:
> >
At what line did you add this? I got this to go with this:
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@
buildinstall.append(self.topdir)
if self.cfg.version_from in [ "F9" ]:
+ buildinstall.append('--output')
+ buildinstall.append(self.topdir)
for burl in repository_baseurls:
buildinstall.append('%s' % burl)
> > Linking in release notes:
> > ######################################## 100.0%
> > Size of the installation tree is 518 MB
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/revisor/__init__.py", line 528, in run
> > self.base.run()
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/revisor/base.py", line 106, in run
> > self.cli.run()
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/revisor/cli.py", line 44, in run
> > self.base.lift_off()
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/revisor/base.py", line 867, in lift_off
> > self.buildInstallationMedia()
> > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/revisor/base.py", line 1478,
> > in buildInstallationMedia
> > f = open(os.path.join(mypungi.topdir,"isolinux","isolinux.cfg"),"rw+")
> > IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > '/var/tmp/revisor-pungi/0.5.2/xs-f9-i386/i386/os/isolinux/isolinux.cfg'
> > Traceback occurred, please report a bug at http://fedorahosted.org/revisor
> >
> > The size should be more like 850mb.
> >
> > Did you have any luck in your own experiment?
> >
> No, I stopped when it bombed out, had to do my real work, must of been
> at the point you got past with the patched pungi.py.
>
Think that has to do with not having the F9-buildinstall from revisor,
the stock one didn't play nice for me either. I ended up 571 rpms on the
test iso. I haven't tried to test it yet..
Jerry
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
