Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> It seems both openmpi and libotf supply a %{_bindir}/otfdump. otf is
>> either:
>>
>> OpenTypeFont (libotf)
>> or
>> OpenTraceFormat (openmpi)
>>
>> I maintain libotf. I'm not sure how to address this.
>>
>> My only interest in libotf is so emacs can use it. For that, it doesn't
>> need the binaries. Perhaps they could be put somewhere else?
>>
>> I don't know how important otfdump is to openmpi, since I don't use it.
>> My guess is that in both libotf and openmpi, neither is critical to
>> function, but is a debug aid.
>>
>>
> Are they the same? If so, my gut would be to use the one in libotf, if
> it's complete, maybe in a subpackage, and have openmpi remove it's own
> and Require it, sort of the way we handle bundled libraries.
>
> -J
>
They have nothing in common, just unfortunately the same name.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
