Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:13:52AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> The single month you're willing to wait is not much of a problem. There is
> a more fundamental problem. The non-responsive packager procedure could
> have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already.
> There have been dead silent bugzilla tickets that ought to have raised an
> alarm-bell.

I would have started the process earlier, if I did not have to write
several mails for it in specific intervalls, e.g. when I spotted the
first bug report. But imho it is too much a PITA to write these mails at
these intervalls and also if I spot a problem, then I normally have some
spare time to spend on Fedora, which might not be the case when the
process is finished and I could start the actual work.

Regards
Till

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux