Re: Non-responsive maintainer process for kurzawa / Krzysztof Kurzawski

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The non-responsive packager procedure could
> have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already.
> There have been dead silent bugzilla tickets that ought to have raised an
> alarm-bell.

Is this something that could be automated? FWIW, Debian has a
"Work-Needing Packages" script that spams devel based on simple
metrics from the bugtracker. The same script could point out inactive
maintainers.

This is also a good tool for guiding new volunteers to areas that need
attention.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux