Re: [PATCH 3/3] dracut has initrd-generic-<version> instead of initrd-<version> (#519185)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Note that we have the same problem with any package which does static
> linking against an lgpl library (such as glibc). 

This is (one of the big reasons) why we only permit static linking with
explicit approval from FESCo.

I'm really very uncomfortable with the generic initrd not including
matching sources in the corresponding SRPM (whether that is kernel or
some dedicated "generic-dracut" package is immaterial). The answer of
"the sources are in the Fedora lookaside cache, somewhere, go track it
down yourself" isn't really sufficient for me.

Unfortunately, I can't think of a good way to package up a generic
initrd in a way that we can provide source properly. I'm open to
suggestions though.

~spot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux