Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: >>> It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a >>> distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the having to >>> support a pre-build package model for the initrd. >> >> The problem is this: >> >> The kernel binary RPM contains this pre-built initrd. The kernel source >> RPM does not contain the sources necessary to make this pre-built initrd. >> This makes me rather uncomfortable from a Licensing perspective. > > True, but we do provide SRPMS with the sources, if we include a list of > the SRPMS with the sources, with full NEVR in the kernel rpm as doc, > wouldn't that be sufficient? Not really. In the case of initrd-built-with-kernel, it could be packages in the buildroot that never leave koji for release/updates, and are then garbage collected. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
