Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:13:25 -0700, Jesse wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:44 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
> > move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
> > filesystem package. 
> 
> Then the guidelines should be fixed to create less confusion over the
> matter.

Hear, hear!  Really, it's the guidelines that make reviewers and packagers
come up with strange "solutions" such as these use of triggers.

Other packagers find themselves in a trap and create package dependency
bloat just to get the dir ownership "right". Even if they are unhappy with
the result.

E.g. seahorse-plugins requires gedit and epiphany. Hard to believe, but
it's true. :-/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux