Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Relyea (rrelyea@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> triggers were the suggestion of the package reviewer to avoid  
> multi-ownership(IIRC). If there is unanimity on what the correct  
> solution should be, I'm sure Elio would be happy to implement it. Moving  
> /etc/prelink.conf.d to filesystem would obviously be the simplest for  
> the nss package.

Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
filesystem package.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux