On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 > > > > in a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get > > > > this port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization > > > > databases, that way lies confusion and madness. > > > > > > The PolicyKitOne feature page does include in its contingency plan: > > > "If not all ports listed above can be completed in time, keep PolicyKit > > > 0.9 around..." > > > > Right. But from what I've heard that is not the case. Jreznik just said: > > > > > > I have initial port [...] seems like it's working now and usable. > > Yes, I have port but I'm not sure how to combine it into current KDE as it > breaks polkit-qt API and I don't like shipping big patches that actually > forks project. I'd like to see it from upstream. And this apply only to polkit-qt-core, I'm not even sure it's easily possible to port polkit-qt-gui without mayor rewrite. Jaroslav > I'm working on this, we have topic for our next KDE SIG meeting. If you > could join, it would be great - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings. > > Matthias, could you please look at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519674 > > Thanks > Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
