On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in > > > a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this > > > port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization > > > databases, that way lies confusion and madness. > > > > The PolicyKitOne feature page does include in its contingency plan: > > "If not all ports listed above can be completed in time, keep PolicyKit > > 0.9 around..." > > Right. But from what I've heard that is not the case. Jreznik just said: > > > I have initial port [...] seems like it's working now and usable. Yes, I have port but I'm not sure how to combine it into current KDE as it breaks polkit-qt API and I don't like shipping big patches that actually forks project. I'd like to see it from upstream. I'm working on this, we have topic for our next KDE SIG meeting. If you could join, it would be great - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings. Matthias, could you please look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519674 Thanks Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
