On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Brian Pepple<bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:58 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > Broken deps for i386 >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >> > anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> > anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol) >> > anjal-0.1.0-0.7.20090821git5ac8bfe.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> > empathy-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> > empathy-devel-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol) >> > empathy-libs-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> > empathy-python-2.27.5-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> > nautilus-sendto-1.1.6-2.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0 >> >> I don't remember the bump nitrification email for this going to fedora-devel. > > My fault. I wasn't aware of anything using mission-control other than > empathy & nautilus-sendto which I was working on updating. Sorry. Thee seems to be a dependency peculiarity with telepathy-mission-control-5.2.1-1; it requires libmcclient-5.2.1.so, which is provided by telepathy-mission-control-devel; should a package have a dependency on its -devel package? Further, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1513479 shows that telepathy-mission-control-devel both provides and requires libmcclient-5.2.1.so; is this normal? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
