2009/8/27 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 08/27/2009 06:37 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> Sounds great. In this case, this would be gnome-packagekit specific, >> right? I would not need to touch the backend at all. > > In my understanding, that is correct. Yes, the majority of the work woulf in the client, deselecting updates according to what failed the depsolve. The PackageKit desktop-neutral parts (the harder parts) would be extracting the package_id[1] of the package that failed depsolving. This might be fairly yum specific too. It's certainly not less than 5 hours of work. It would be a cool trick, however. Richard. [1] http://www.packagekit.org/gtk-doc/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
