On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:36 +0400, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > 22.08.2009 03:03, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Aurelien Bompard wrote: > >> - gwenview -- Simple image viewer for KDE > > > > This one is obsolete, gwenview is part of kdegraphics these days. > > > > Kevin Kofler > > But may be separate package is more "right" solution?? Also not problem > have both packages in Fedora or I mistaken? > That's a matter of aesthetics, and there's no real right answer: Debian, Ubuntu and Mandriva tend to split packages into multiple subs; Fedora tend to keep as close as a one-to-one correspondence between source RPM and binary RPM (save splitting off -devel, -doc, and if a package contains libraries that are usable elsewhere, -libs). openSUSE is in-between. The point, though, is that a package maintainer is in charge of the entire source package (SRPM). So you can't just take over gwenview without taking over kdegraphics. Now, if there are any actively-maintained branches (perhaps EPEL 4 or EPEL 5) that still has a standalone gwenview, and you feel like maintaining it for that branch, that's a different question. Regards, -- Michel Salim <Michael.Silvanus@xxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
