Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Indeed. A single tomboy build obsoleted more than a dozen Mono packages
>> and actually got marked stable sometimes later without anyone adding
>> a comment.
>
> I'd blame the tomboy maintainer for the chaos there. Before you push an
> update to a package, you MUST check for previous updates for the package
> (possibly filed by somebody else, Bodhi will NOT mail you about them, even
> if you are the maintainer!), and if it's a grouped update, you CANNOT push a
> new update for your package, you MUST get it updated in the group instead.

Sorry but the fail here is 100% on bodhi's side , why does a single
package obsolete a complete group update?
That is just broken, and this example clearly showed it.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux