On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:50 -0400, Josh wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:19:39AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> ====================================================================== >> >> The results in this summary consider Test Updates! >> >> ====================================================================== >> >> >> >> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): >> >> >> >> beagle >> >> bmpx >> >> clipsmm >> >> f-spot >> >> fedora-business-cards >> >> kdeedu >> >> openmpi >> >> openvrml >> >> ppl >> >> R-RScaLAPACK >> >> rubygem-main >> >> rubygem-rails >> >> scheme2js >> >> tomboy >> > >> >Is it just me or are there some packages that seem to be eternally on >> >this list? beage/f-spot/tomboy never seem to go anywhere. >> >> They're eternally broken on ppc64. Mostly due to Mono being broken on ppc64. > >Really? Then why has somebody added ppc64 to the ExclusiveArch list >for many but not all of the Mono packages? I think that spec files >from F-12 devel have been copied to F-11 without making sure that >Mono has been built for ppc64 there. That could very well be. I also know that there was some work done during F11 development to make Mono work on ppc64 and it did for a while. Yet an update seems to have hose that? If people need access to a ppc64 box to fix Mono issues, just let me know. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list