On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm sorry, I *do* value emails, as they let me know when something's wrong (Like fail to build from source, or broken dependencies). I don't know what I could've said instead... Repetitive?
Alright, I'll push the update.
Sorry for calling it 'annoying'.
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:Thanks for calling it "annoying". :-/ It's people like you that make me
> I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
> reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
> anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then
I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of
the broken deps checks.
I'm sorry, I *do* value emails, as they let me know when something's wrong (Like fail to build from source, or broken dependencies). I don't know what I could've said instead... Repetitive?
Doesn't matter much. A "yum install beagle" on ppc64 doesn't work
> Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.
anymore.
Alright, I'll push the update.
Sorry for calling it 'annoying'.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno
Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos
Sitio: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
