Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:

> I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it, the
> reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
> anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.

Thanks for calling it "annoying". :-/  It's people like you that make me
look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then
I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of
the broken deps checks.

> Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.

Doesn't matter much. A "yum install beagle" on ppc64 doesn't work
anymore.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux