Re: Updates lacking descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Mathieu Bridon
(bochecha)<bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Being a group of volunteers doesn't mean we shouldn't aim for more quality.

Ah..but project wide..is this place to have a quality enhancement
discussion currently? Let me try to put this into perspective. This
post started about 4 updates. How many updates have we pushed? What is
our defect rate? Like 1% or something?  What's are defect rate
associated with packaging generally? Aren't we seeing more packaging
defects than update text defects? And if so, shouldn't we
concentrating on packaging defect prevention until the defect rate
drops below the defect rate in update texts?

It's nice to talk about a zero defect goal...but enforcing that goal
with policy enforcement is a rabbit hole requiring infinite resources.
Doubly so because there is clearly an interpretation factor here as to
what is too much or too little detail to be included.

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux