Re: Updates lacking descriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/12/2009 11:54 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:

If this is enforced (and it may be good to add it to the
critical-path suggestion), updates will be reduced since when
there's little to write about, there's less justification for an
update in the first place.

Correct, such a step will add a significant bureaucratic burdons to maintainers.

As maintainers hate bureaucrazy and prefer investing time on dealing with technical issues (such as bug fixes), this will likely introduce a further reduction of the quality of Fedora.

Further more, do you realise that any changelog is likely similarly unreadable to most users?

Ralf

PS.: Stop cross-posting to newsgroups. I consider everybody who does this to behave rude.



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux