On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/13/2009 03:42 PM, Pierre-Yves wrote: > > > People who wants to write an extensive changelog will and people who > > don't want won't. > > Quality doesn't come from letting everybody do whatever they want. Then I'm curious about: 1- How do you want to make this mandatory rather than advised ? 2- How are you going to check it ? 3- How do you cover cases where there are no changelog upstream ? :-) Let me make things clear, I agree that the information should be there and that it would be nice if we were doing it more (I include myself here), but I don't see how that could become mandatory :-) > > Btw IMHO changelog on the spec reflects change that happened to the > > packaging (change in the spec) they do not reflect the change happened > > to the software (changes documented in the changelog in the sources when > > there is one). > > There is a difference between the changelog and the bodhi update > information. The latter also covers software changes. Agreed here :) Best regards, Pierre -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
