On 08/06/2009 10:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > so if a package does get an 'adventurous' update > then hits a security bug, there's no way to have a separate update > without the adventurous change but with the security bug fixed so, two separate issues: one is making the updates, the other is solving for them. I only meant that with tags you could potentially solve for available updates within a single repo. > I'm not sure you could _make_ a 'Solid' spin unless there was a Solid > update path to work off. Right, to do that we'd need a SIG interested in making sure there was one. Some package developers/maintainers would probably join, others wouldn't be interested. It's probably not necessary to have all of Fedora in such a spin, but where there are users there tends to be interest. -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440 BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668 http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Cell: 603.252.2606 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle Page: 603.442.1833 Email, IM, VOIP: bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/ VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
