On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Adam Williamson<awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > >> > Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of >> > expectation: we have two similar components, GNOME and KDE, in the same >> > distribution, following different update polices - GNOME favours stable, >> > KDE favours adventurous. This confounds expectation. >> >> I don't know that this is really the case. KDE is rolling up a bugfix >> release. Gnome does bugfix releases. Other than a difference in how >> they number them, is there really that big of a difference in what they >> are doing? > > It's not a bugfix release, it's a bit ingenuous to describe it as one. Except for the fact that it fixes *over 10,000 bugs*. [1] And I believe the word you are looking for is *dis*ingenuous. It's hard to believe KDE 4.2 had that many bugs... [1] http://kde.org/announcements/4.3/index.php -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
