On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 00:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:15 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > Hi FESCo, > > > > After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature > > owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or > > their ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of > > information provided or percentage of completion. > <snip> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2.28 > <snip> > > Feature will obviously be done on time. The feature process doesn't seem > so forgiving about things happening upstream rather than downstream... > > > In accordance with our recorded process about providing status, I am > > proposing that they reviewed and dropped from the Fedora 12 feature list > > at Friday's FESCo meeting. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Dropping > > I'll make sure one of the Desktop-y guys updates this (presumably > Matthias). I actually looked at this, and the feature process just isn't good enough for this. We can't really say we're at 100% for GNOME 2.28 when it hasn't been released, now can we? So what's expected of such features when the feature process seems inappropriate? Cheers -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
