On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On 07/31/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > We don't complain about no public source repo. See deltarpm. It's "repo" > > consists of the tarball we use already. It doesn't even have an easily > > findable project website. > > > We're supposed to. The review for deltarpm says that the reviewer > checked the tarball against upstream: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202033 > > This is what's in the current spec: > """ > URL: http://gitorious.org/deltarpm/deltarpm > > Source: %{name}-git-20090729.tar.bz2 > """ > > This doesn't follow the Guidelines but doesn't look as bad as you say. > There is a public source repo on gitorious. jdieter has commit access > there. It seems like all that's needed is the comment that says: > > # Generate source by doing: > # git clone -r XXXXXXXXXX http://gitorious.org/deltarpm/deltarpm > # tar -czf deltrpm-%{version}.tar.gz deltarpm FWIW, the old deltarpm web page died a while ago, but the source for official releases has always been available at ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/deltarpm/deltarpm-3.4.tar.bz2 (and that's been the source tag in the spec file up until I branched off of the new git repo last week). I'll go ahead and fix the spec file to show where I'm getting the current source. Sorry about the mistake. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
