On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:09:43PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: >On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 01:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> That's kind of side tracking though. Point is that SRPM as upstream >> source is simply a stupid thing. We would complain loudly or atleast >> whine about it if Novell or Mandriva or Debian did that. Wouldn't we? >> >> Why should we have an exception anymore? I can't think of a single >> reason why we should. >> > >If there was no public available source repo, yes we'd complain. If >there was, I don't think we'd complain really. We don't complain about no public source repo. See deltarpm. It's "repo" consists of the tarball we use already. It doesn't even have an easily findable project website. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
