Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:17:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 07:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> >> I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try
>> >> and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this
>> >> system runs F12.
>> >
>> >Normally, bodhi would have added a comment like "This update has been
>> >submitted for testing" and a similar one for "stable" plus another
>> >comment for the actual push. Such comments are missing in this ticket,
>> >as if it has not been submitted to any repo yet. And it's not a security
>> >update which enter the Security Team's queue before such comments appear.
>> 
>> Exactly.  It hasn't been pushed at all.  The maintainer needs to click the
>> 'push to testing' or 'push to stable' buttons in Bodhi.
>
>Yikes, seems everything I post lately gets misunderstood. :) I know
>that's the _process_ reason why it hasn't shown up, of course - it
>hasn't been manually pushed. What I was getting at is that I didn't know
>why Andreas hasn't manually pushed it yet, and I was thinking it may be
>because no-one's tested it.

Testing is usually done via updates-testing.  Which it hasn't been pushed to ;)

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux