On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:09:30 -0700, Adam wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:29 +0000, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial > > > > vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial > > > > > > I thought I'd seen these addressed on the list before, but just in case: > > > synce-serial is entirely deprecated now, it is not needed for anything. > > > These packages should not depend on it, and synce-hal should obsolete > > > it. > > > > Erm - actually, vdccm is obsoleted by synce-hal too. Sorry. > > May be true, but such a synce-hal is not in the repos yet. (Extras repoclosure > does evaluate Obsoletes tags) Yes, I meant that synce-hal obsoletes vdccm in a code sense, so the package ought to have the Obsoletes set if it isn't already. Sorry to not be clear. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.1-1.fc11,synce-sync-engine-0.14-1.fc11,synce-hal-0.14-1.fc11,synce-kpm-0.14-1.fc11,librra-0.14-1.fc11,librapi-0.14-1.fc11,unshield-0.6-1.fc11,libsynce-0.14-1.fc11 > > Submitted on 2009-07-21, still pending. Not pushed anywhere? Bodhi problem? > > > vdccm => synce-serial is obsolete > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498409 > > synce-kde => synce-serial is obsolete > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498410 I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this system runs F12. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
