On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:23:12PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Pasi Pirhonen wrote : > > > > Here's the content of my ifcfg-ctc0 file, it's the post-install default > > > and seems correct to me : > > > > > > # IBM CTC > > > DEVICE=ctc0 > > > BOOTPROTO=static > > > BROADCAST=192.168.200.3 > > > IPADDR=192.168.200.3 > > > MTU=1500 > > > NETMASK=255.255.255.255 > > > NETWORK=192.168.200.3 > > > ONBOOT=yes > > > QETH=yes > > > REMIP=192.168.200.4 > > > SUBCHANNELS=0.0.0600,0.0.0601 > > > TYPE=QETH > > > > > > > One should not do replying when > > > > a) in hurry > > b) knowing that you should have been bed hours ago > > c) tired (b) > > > > > > For all the other information (which are valid) i wrote about thise > > before, it seems just that > > > > QETH=yes > > TYPE=QETH > > > > Are not valid for this setup. The magic in network-functions get all > > wrong when CTC is defined as QETH, so it more like should be > > > > TYPE=CTC > > > > and nuke that 'QETH=yes' line alltogether. > > It works! This is definitely a bug in Fedora Core Development, then. I've > been wondering all along, but now I know that : > - The ctc module doesn't get loaded automatically, 1st bug > - The TYPE= of the ctc interface is wrong, as you reported, 2nd bug > > I've verified that fixing only one of the two bugs is never enough, both > must be solved before the ctc0 interface can come up. I think I've found and fixed the bugs, thanks for narrowing them down ! Karsten -- Karsten Hopp <karsten@xxxxxxxxx> GPG 1024D/70ABD02C Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58 70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111
