Re: Definition of Open Source [was Re: pine: UW permission to distribute]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 21, 2004, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I do agree that Fedora Core should always be 100% Open Source.  I also
> believe that Extras need not be this strict.  If you dislike some part
> of Extras, then just don't use it.

Unless some other package you do want to use happens to have been
built in such a way that it depends on a package you'd rather not
use, such that the one you didn't want may get installed onto your box
and you may not even notice.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux