Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2009/7/24 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>: >> Nicolas Chauvet píše v Pá 24. 07. 2009 v 10:06 +0200: >>> This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged >>> with gc. Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to >>> maintain it over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1 >>> where libatomic_ops snapshot is newer ? >>> (despite versioned as 1.2) >> >> But do you know about any status update or confirmation of the plan from >> upstream besides the 1 year old notice on thier web page? I couldn't >> find anything on their mailing list. > Because you didn't ask, did you ? > http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2009-July/subject.html > > At least, doing a diff between libatomic_ops-1.2 and > gc-7.1/libatomic_ops-1.2 shows that the gc 7.1 version much more > newer. I'll get to work on it (preferably keeping it in the separate libatomic_ops cvs module for now). -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
