Re: [pkgdb] libatomic_ops: sharkcz has requested approveacls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This package was orphaned because libatomic_ops is going to be merged with gc.
Do we have a particular rationale about why to continue to maintain it
over splitting libatomic_ops-static from the current gc 7.1 where
libatomic_ops snapshot is newer ?
(despite versioned as 1.2)

Nicolas (kwizart)

2009/7/24 Fedora PackageDB <pkgdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> sharkcz has requested the approveacls acl on libatomic_ops (Fedora devel)
>
> To make changes to this package see:
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libatomic_ops
>
> --
> fedora-extras-commits mailing list
> fedora-extras-commits@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-commits
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux