Re: Critical Path Packages - Enforcement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote:
> Another open question is who is going to QA critical-path-kde, as we still
> don't have a dedicated tester in KDE SIG. Anybody volunteering to be a
> tester for KDE SIG is requested to talk to us on the #fedora-kde IRC chan
> and/or the fedora-kde mailing list. Being a tester has a much lower
> barrier to entry than most other forms of contribution, you just need some
> HD space to install test systems to (ideally, you'd have Rawhide, Fn and
> Fn-1 on at least one machine each, but even just testing one release is
> helpful) and some spare time. No programming, drawing, technical writing
> etc. skills required. I will post a call for help to the fedora-test-list
> as well. (Note that we do have a KDE SIG member in rel-eng (rdieter), so
> that part is covered.)

That part seems to be taken care of now, I managed to recruit a few QA 
volunteers. :-)

That said, my remaining questions about enforcement of critical path 
packages are still unanswered. :-(

        Kevin Kofler


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux