On 07/14/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:32:08PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: >> On Tue July 14 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> JK> At 7000+ srpms there is no way I could evaluate each and every one >>> JK> for validity before submitting it for a rebuild. >>> >>> I think the point is that the package owner should have deleted it >>> from devel so that there would be nothing for rel-eng to rebuild. >> >> Imho if the devel branch is a problem, then it should not be created when the >> package is imported to CVS, if it is a epel-only package. Requesting such >> strange actions from package maintainers who may not know all the magic behind >> the build system will only lead to errors like this one. > > You have a valid point. I'm not sure if the cvs scripts or pkgdb can currently > cope with that though. If you have the time to look into it, I'm sure it > would be appreciated. All sorts of breakage is likely to occur without a devel branch in the pkgdb meta-data. We might be able to get rid of the actual cvs directory but I wouldn't bet that something doesn't rely on this as well. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
