Re: epel-release in Fedora repos?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "TM" == Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

TM> Imho if the devel branch is a problem, then it should not be
TM> created when the package is imported to CVS, if it is a epel-only
TM> package.

The devel branch is mandatory, but that doesn't mean that the package
owner has to import anything there if they don't need it.

Honestly, though, packages that will be in EPEL but not in Fedora at
all are very rare exceptions and retooling the infrastructure to
handle them specially would be something of a waste of effort.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux