On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David <brusefamelion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Frank Murphy wrote: >>>> Doesn't seem to work for wine :) >>> >>> That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables >>> are. >>> >>> Kevin Kofler >> >> >> "Winblow$"? >> >> You really should learn some control here. >> >> The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show >> respect where respect is warranted. >> >> Microsoft should recieve that respect IMO. >> >> 90% of the desktop computers in the world use some version of Windows. >> More desktop computers use some form of Mac OS than all combined >> versions (distributions) of Linux. >> >> WINE? Is a nice concept. But it will never, again IMO, as long as the >> 'Windows programs' that WINE can run are mostly really old DOS programs. >> >> Sheesh. >> -- >> > > Perhaps you should do a little research before you spout off. Wine is > capable of running very modern day applications that are written for the > windows platform. It is anything but old dos programs. Mr. Keating. May I call you Jessie? I know who you are and I respect you a lot. Would you please name "some very modern day applications that are written for the windows platform" that will run in a Linux current version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_ applications. The ones that ordinary 'users' want. Not the geeky ones that 'Linux geeks' want. I am serious here. Really. The names are...? -- David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
