2009/7/10 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following >> x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when >> compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits? >> >> mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 needs >> >> glibc.i686 >> libdrm.i586 >> libdrm-devel.i586 >> nss-softokn-freebl.i586 > >> pulseaudio-module-x11.x86_64 needs >> >> alsa-lib.i586 >> dbus-libs.i586 >> e2fsprogs-libs.i586 >> flac.i586 >> gdbm.i586 >> glibc.i586 >> libICE.i586 >> libSM.i586 >> libX11.i586 >> libXau.i586 >> libXext.i586 >> libXtst.i586 >> libasyncns.i586 >> libattr.i586 >> libcap.i586 >> libgcc.i586 >> libogg.i586 >> libsndfile.i586 >> libstdc++.i586 >> libxcb.i586 >> ncurses-libs.i586 >> nss-softokn-freebl.i586 >> pulseaudio-libs.i586 >> pulseaudio-utils.i586 >> readline.i586 >> sqlite.i586 >> tcp_wrappers-libs.i586 > > I'm pretty sure you're looking at it wrong. > > [spot@velociraptor devel]$ rpm -q mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 --requires > /usr/bin/pkg-config > libGL.so.1()(64bit) > libX11-devel > mesa-libGL = 7.5-0.14.fc11 > pkgconfig(dri2proto) >= 1.99.3 > pkgconfig(libdrm) >= 2.4.3 > pkgconfig(x11) > pkgconfig(xdamage) > pkgconfig(xext) > pkgconfig(xfixes) > pkgconfig(xxf86vm) > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > > [spot@velociraptor devel]$ rpm -q pulseaudio-module-x11.x86_64 --requires > /bin/sh > config(pulseaudio-module-x11) = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 > libICE.so.6()(64bit) > libSM.so.6()(64bit) > libX11.so.6()(64bit) > libXtst.so.6()(64bit) > libasyncns.so.0()(64bit) > libc.so.6()(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) > libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) > libdl.so.2()(64bit) > libltdl.so.7()(64bit) > libm.so.6()(64bit) > liboil-0.3.so.0()(64bit) > libprotocol-native.so()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > libpulse.so.0()(64bit) > libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit) > libpulsecommon-0.9.16.so()(64bit) > libpulsecore-0.9.16.so()(64bit) > librt.so.1()(64bit) > libsamplerate.so.0()(64bit) > libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) > libspeexdsp.so.1()(64bit) > libtdb.so.1()(64bit) > libwrap.so.0()(64bit) > pulseaudio = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 > pulseaudio-utils = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rtld(GNU_HASH) > >> I also found dupllicates of NetworkManager x86_64 and .i586 and >> others. I wanted some -devel packages but I thought only the x86_64 >> versions would be pulled in. >> >> How have this happened? > > Not sure how you managed it, but the packages themselves are correct. > > ~spot > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > I don't know but when I try to install one of those x86_64 packages it pulls the i586 as dependencies. I've pointed all repo files to x86_64 and I really don't know how and why this happens? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
