Matej Cepl wrote:
Well, I always understood, that documentation which is part of normal
package is OK, but source package which contains nothing else than
documentation isn't. But then yes we have man-pages. Hmm.
man-pages appears to be misnamed glibc-doc (well, okay, glibc + kernel).
If we start drafting guidelines that would exclude /that/, then we have
a problem ;-).
I'm on the fence w.r.t. "third-party" books on using Fedora components
(e.g. DIP). Beyond that I tend to agree with "don't ship content" except
to the extent it is shipped by upstream (e.g. shipping the "official"
KDE wallpapers is fine, but unofficial wallpapers should not be shipped).
(And before anyone asks, obviously "Fedora Official" content, e.g.
solar-backgrounds is okay also.)
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
It is training and experience that gives us the ability to abstract
problems, remain objective, use previous knowledge, interact with users,
and herd cats.
-- Celeste Lyn Paul, on Usability Experts
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
