>>>>> "MC" == Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: MC> So, how should I propose to FESCO exclusion of DiveIntoPython MC> (BTW, wonderful book), Jules Verne and anything else we find? Open a ticket on their trac (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/). The issue here is that the guidelines explicitly permit documentation and help files; diveintopython is obviously documenting Python, and if it was bundled with the Python tarball then there wouldn't be any question at all about this. So I'm not really sure that the place where you draw the line is all that clear. At least the python package itself includes some reasonable documentation about the language. But the package that spawned this duscussion, the device drivers book, actually documents the kernel where the kernel doesn't really document itself. And there are other reviews for this kind of thing pending: javanotes, for example (https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=507916) covers Java for which we have little in-distro documentation, and there's at least one other package submitted by the same person. Make sure that the line you draw is clear with regards those packages as well. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
