On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > [cut] > Patching the configure > script is much safer than patching configure.ac, then have autoconf grok all > .m4 macros and rebuild the whole thing, likely ending up with a completely > different beast, that not only includes your changes but who knows what > else. > What else? You and some other people are defending this from the beginning of this thread but no one explained what else might change. If I patch configure.ac and Makefile.am, then run autotools and build the RPM package that way, what else might go in unnoticed? Please back up your claims. I do not have much knowledge to make claims in either direction but I am willing to learn. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
