Maybe it's about time we had a FC repo cleanup day, everyone join IRC and we debate what to ship to Extras to avoid duplication. - David On tor, 2004-07-15 at 12:09 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:44, Build System wrote: > >> > >> balsa-2.2.0-1,FC3,2 > >> ------------------- > >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.2.0-1,FC3,2 > >> > >> - add a 64 bit patch > >> > >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.2.0-1,FC3,1 > >> > >> - bring up to latest upstream > >> had to change the following from the upstream src rpm: > >> dependency on pspell to aspell > >> build dependency on libesmtp to libesmtp-devel > >> comment out packager rpm tag, RH build system won't accept it > >> > >> * Sat Jul 26 2003 Misu Moldovan <dumol@xxxxx> > >> > >> - further split the Red Hat and Mandrake sections > >> - fix Mandrake 9.x dependencies > > > > Hum.. if we're *talking* about removing ethereal then I think balsa's > > removal from core should at least be discussed: I can't recall the last > > time I've seen anybody even mention using Balsa. Of course it's possible > > a) I haven't seen balsa-related discussions because I'm not looking for > > them b) it's so perfect the users are too happy to complain ... but > > somehow I doubt both of those. We got plenty enough email-clients in > > core already, I think balsa would be best moved to Extras. > > > > - Panu - > > I would say the same of licq, that we should move these less popular clients into extras. > > Warren > >
