> On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:44, Build System wrote: >> >> balsa-2.2.0-1,FC3,2 >> ------------------- >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.2.0-1,FC3,2 >> >> - add a 64 bit patch >> >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.2.0-1,FC3,1 >> >> - bring up to latest upstream >> had to change the following from the upstream src rpm: >> dependency on pspell to aspell >> build dependency on libesmtp to libesmtp-devel >> comment out packager rpm tag, RH build system won't accept it >> >> * Sat Jul 26 2003 Misu Moldovan <dumol@xxxxx> >> >> - further split the Red Hat and Mandrake sections >> - fix Mandrake 9.x dependencies > > Hum.. if we're *talking* about removing ethereal then I think balsa's > removal from core should at least be discussed: I can't recall the last > time I've seen anybody even mention using Balsa. Of course it's possible > a) I haven't seen balsa-related discussions because I'm not looking for > them b) it's so perfect the users are too happy to complain ... but > somehow I doubt both of those. We got plenty enough email-clients in > core already, I think balsa would be best moved to Extras. > > - Panu - I would say the same of licq, that we should move these less popular clients into extras. Warren
