On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Gilboa Davara<gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 21:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 05:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> > > and no, glxgears is not a benchmark! >> > >> > Indeed, glxgears really sucks as as a benchmark, Phoronix's benchmark suite >> > (as imperfect as it is) is definitely more useful. >> >> I keep meaning to file a feature request for glxgears - remove the FPS >> display...if it's not a benchmark, let's not make it look like one. > > > While not an effective benchmark, but a good tool to check that DRI/DRM > is working. > > Grated, it would have been nice if out-of-the-box OSS OpenGL > benchmarking and testing tools (outside the closed benchmarks and game > demos used by the Phoronix suite), but for now, we are more-or-less > limited to glxgears... There are alot of open source games[1} that are useable to for benchmarking. glxgears is NOT a benchmark. If you don't have anything but glxgears than you have NO benchmark. [1]: openarena, nexuiz, ... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list